Netiquette

I wonder at times if I’m the only person on this planet who gets annoyed by people who have no clue what Netiquette means. Yes I write that with a capital N on purpose… To answer my own statement, I actually do know a few close people who feel the same and I know for sure that two of them would have the same reaction as I have when the rules of Netiquette are ignored once again. I have discussed this topic with both at some point and I could tell from a certain reaction by one of them while we were still colleagues that he wasn’t happy at all when it occurred. So I guess it would be safe to say that I’m allowed to be annoyed by this issue…

Picture this: you would be living in a huge house with about thirty rooms and each room would have a tenant that would be connected in some way to other tenants in the same house. One day you expect an important letter to arrive, a letter with very personal information that you wish to keep to yourself. You would come home and look through the pile of post that has been delivered that day to find out that your letter isn’t there. Then one of the other tenants hands the letter over to you with a smile and walks off. You immediately notice that the letter has been opened and not only that, you also find out that this private information has been spread amongst the other tenants like a virus. What would your first reaction be?

Now how would you feel if you find out that some people, especially close people, can’t be trusted with delicate information? This morning I got two emails in from people that I quite explicitly told not to use my email address for anything else but correspondence between them and me. Shock and horror when I found out that I was made part of this extensive list of people that I never have met before and that I certainly do not wish to ever meet either. I asked both not to ever put me on mailing lists or include me in these so called funny emails and I even explained my reasons why. It doesn’t seem to make a difference, people are either ignorant or plain stupid.

I have tried to explain to some how to use ‘cc’ and ‘bcc’ in emails in the past and most of them could understand and would start using bcc instead of cc but do I really have to continue educating common sense for the rest of my digital life? I adjusted my ways already and now use several different email addresses for different people so I won’t get spam in on the ones that I either need for business use or private use: the ones that are really important to me. But why do I need to change my ways just because some still refuse to show some respect for other people’s privacy. It’s something that I just don’t get and yes, it pisses me off at times. Because of these people I have to use spam filters these days just to keep all the crap out of my mailboxes.

I think I will either delete some contacts from my address book or buy some nice paper, stamps, envelopes and refill my old fountain pen…

Snippet:

Beyond matters of basic courtesy and privacy, email syntax allows for different types of recipients. The primary recipient, defined by the To: line, can reasonably be expected to respond, but recipients of carbon copies cannot be, although they still might. Likewise, misuse of the CC/BCC functions in lieu of traditional mailing lists can result in serious technical issues. In late 2007, employees of the United States Department of Homeland Security used large CC lists in place of a tool like Majordomo to broadcast messages to several hundred users. Misuse of the “reply to all” caused the number of responses to that message to quickly expand to some 2 million messages, bringing down their mail server. In cases like this, rules of Netiquette have to do with efficient sharing of resources and ensuring that the associated technology continues to function rather than more basic etiquette.

© Wikipedia about Netiquette

Blog Action Day 2007 – Environment

Today is Blog Action Day I ran into this website by accident about a week ago and I’ve decided to participate and write an environmental post…

Last year October I went to MacExpo here in London and ran into a girl near the entrance of Olympia, Kensington, who kindly gave me a leaflet and a green apple. I had no idea she was representing Greenpeace back then but after my visit to MacExpo I read the leaflet and decided to write a post about Greenpeace and their ‘Green My Apple’ campaign which was launched in September 2006. Ever since I read about the campaign I have had my Green My Apple logo published in my sidebar to make more people and especially Mac users, aware of this problem.

On the second of May this year Steve Jobs decided to publish his message on the front page of Apple’s website saying ‘Today we’re changing our policy’:

Snippet:

Apple has been criticized by some environmental organizations for not being a leader in removing toxic chemicals from its new products, and for not aggressively or properly recycling its old products. Upon investigating Apple’s current practices and progress towards these goals, I was surprised to learn that in many cases Apple is ahead of, or will soon be ahead of, most of its competitors in these areas. Whatever other improvements we need to make, it is certainly clear that we have failed to communicate the things that we are doing well.

Read more here –>

Today Greenpeace published another story about one of my favourite gadgets which made me think twice about whether to buy it or not. Scientific tests done at Greenpeace’s Research Laboratories in the UK revealed that the iPhone contains two types of hazardous substances: toxic brominated compounds and hazardous PVC. An independent scientific laboratory tested and confirmed the presence of these substances in half the samples including the phone’s antenna. Next month the iPhone will be released in Europe, but I don’t think I will be buying one unless I would be offered a much greener version…

Sources:

Watch the iPhone slideshow

Read the Greenpeace Amsterdam article about scientific findings

Read article about the Green My Apple campaign